An example of how to step-by-step critically evaluate a section of a method from a journal article is provided below: Step 1. Identify our critical point: The sections outlined in red below · 2. “critical appraisal is a systematic process used to identify the strengths and weakness of a research article in order to assess the usefulness and validity of research The evaluation is clearly organized and uses transitional phrases when moving to a new topic. This evaluation includes a summative statement that gives the overall impression of the · It is important to critically evaluate the research article to know the truth behind the claims before using it as a reference in your research paper. Critical evaluation of the · What is a Critical Review? A critical summary of a particular journal article is the analysis of the weaknesses and strengths of the article. It evaluates the content and ideas of ... read more
Were participants in each group treated identically except for the administration of the independent variable? Were steps taken to control for other possible confounds such as regression to the mean, history effects, order effects, etc internal validity? Were ethical considerations adhered to, eg, debriefing, anonymity, informed consent, voluntary participation? Overall, does the method section provide sufficient information to replicate the study? Are the findings complete, clearly presented, comprehensible, and well organised?
Are the statistics reported correctly and fully, eg. are degrees of freedom and p values given? Have the assumptions of the statistical analyses been met, eg. does one group have very different variance to the others? Are salient results connected directly to hypotheses? Are there superfluous results presented that are not relevant to the hypotheses or research question? Are tables and figures clearly labelled? Necessary non-duplicative of text? If a significant result is obtained, consider effect size. Is the finding meaningful? If a non-significant result is found, could low power be an issue? Were there sufficient levels of the IV? If necessary have appropriate post-hoc analyses been performed?
Were any transformations performed; if so, were there valid reasons? Were data collapsed over any IVs; if so, were there valid reasons? If any data was eliminated, were valid reasons given? Are findings adequately interpreted and discussed in terms of the stated research problem, conceptual framework, and hypotheses? Is the interpretation adequate? Are non-significant findings interpreted inappropriately? Is the discussion biased? Are the limitations of the study delineated? Are the overall conclusions warranted by the data and any limitations in the study? Are the conclusions restricted to the population under study or are they generalised too widely?
Is the reference list sufficiently specific to the topic under investigation and current? Are citations used appropriately in the text? Is the article objective, well written and organised? Does the information provided allow you to replicate the study in all its details? Was the study worth doing? Since you are taking on a Route 1: Replication-based dissertation , you will heavily rely on the main theoretical components that make up the Literature Review section of your main journal article. Just remember that it is less common for journal articles to call this section, Literature Review , but instead may use headings that refer to particular theories or constructs that are being investigated.
The goal of this step, STEP A , is to understand these theoretical components so that you can either duplicate them, make some adjustments or additions in order to generalise from them, or to extend them by adding new theories or constructs. By theoretical components , we mean those components that we discussed were important in STEP ONE above when you analysed the broader literature using review articles. These components include: a the constructs discussed in the main journal article, including any definitions used, the perspectives adopted towards such constructs, as well as their dimensions ; b the relationships and boundaries between such constructs, which may be set out in a theoretical model ; and c any discussion on how these constructs were measured.
In addition to simply reading these components of the Literature Review section of the main journal article, you can also a use the review articles to learn about them in more depth, as well as b read the sources set out in the reference list of the main journal article. When looking at the review articles and the sources in the reference list, determine whether any of the same sources were used. For example, if the construct, customer loyalty , was discussed in the main journal article and review article, were any of the sources used the same? If they were, what did the review article have to say about the sources from the main journal article? For example, did the review article criticise those sources quoted in the main journal article e. To get a complete understanding of the main theoretical components in your dissertation, you need to understand those theoretical components used in the main journal article in as much detail as possible.
In any quality journal article, the authors will have identified and discussed potential limitations to their own research. There are some limitations that the authors of your main journal article will a have been able to anticipate before they carried out their research, and those that b became evident during the research process. Let's look at each of these scenarios in turn:. Limitations that may be anticipated BEFORE the research was carried out. There are many instances where it will not have been possible for the authors to avoid potential limitations to their research, even when they were able to anticipate such limitations before the research process started. After all, there are many ideals in research, such as using a probability sampling technique when following a quantitative research design , but factors such as availability , time and money mean that you will often have to settle for something that is not the ideal, such as a non-probability sampling technique.
How to Evaluate Journal Articles. Para evaluar artículos de periódicos considere lo siguiente:. El propósito del artículo : ¿Por qué se escribió el artículo? El tipo de artículo : Para trabajos de nivel universitario la información se debe de obtener en revistas académicos. La oraganización y el contenido : ¿ El material, está organizado y enfocado? La influencia de la casa editora. La fecha del artículo. La bibliografía. La utilidad : ¿Es el artículo relevante para el proyecto de investigación en progreso? La cubertura : ¿Cubre el artículo el tema completamente, parcialmente o generalmente? La audiencia : ¿Para qué tipo de lector está escribiendo el autor? Las ilustraciones : Para ilustrar los conceptos, ¿aparecen diagramas, gráficas, mapas, fotografías,etc.?
Las ilustraciones, ¿son relevantes? Versión detallada de cómo evaluar artículos de periódicos--Inglés. Traducido por Maria Langley. Pour plus de détails sur la façon de distinguer les journaux populaires, des journaux professionnels, des journaux savants, voir: Magazines populaires, magazines professionnels, journaux académiques. Les journaux populaires, comparés aux journaux professionnels et savants. To evaluate a journal article look for:. Chat for Quick Help Ask Us About:. Connect with library staff via chat, email, phone or text. Morgan Library Center Avenue Mall, Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO Skip to content.
Find Services Technology About My Accounts. Colorado State University Libraries Research Guides How to Do Library Research How to Evaluate Journal Articles. How to Do Library Research This set of pages has information on how to do library research. In all cases, once you have located sources, be sure to evaluate them, using the evaluation guides. How to Evaluate Journal Articles How to Evaluate Journal Articles To evaluate a journal article look for: Purpose of Article: Why was the article written? To: persuade the reader to do something? For example: vote a certain way, purchase an item, attend an event inform the reader? Scholarly Journals contain articles describing high quality research that has been reviewed by experts in the field prior to publication. Trade magazines may be useful for topics in business or where economic data is needed.
There are also good for learning what the current "hot topics" are in an area. Popular magazines, such as Time and Newsweek , should be used sparingly, or not at all. Popular vs Trade vs Scholarly Journals. See also Evaluation Clues for Articles Taken from the Web. Organization and Content: Is the material organized and focused? Is the argument or presentation understandable? Is this original research, a review of previous research, or an informative piece?
How to Evaluate Journal Articles. Para evaluar artículos de periódicos considere lo siguiente:. El propósito del artículo : ¿Por qué se escribió el artículo? El tipo de artículo : Para trabajos de nivel universitario la información se debe de obtener en revistas académicos. La oraganización y el contenido : ¿ El material, está organizado y enfocado? La influencia de la casa editora. La fecha del artículo. La bibliografía. La utilidad : ¿Es el artículo relevante para el proyecto de investigación en progreso? La cubertura : ¿Cubre el artículo el tema completamente, parcialmente o generalmente?
La audiencia : ¿Para qué tipo de lector está escribiendo el autor? Las ilustraciones : Para ilustrar los conceptos, ¿aparecen diagramas, gráficas, mapas, fotografías,etc.? Las ilustraciones, ¿son relevantes? Versión detallada de cómo evaluar artículos de periódicos--Inglés. Traducido por Maria Langley. Pour plus de détails sur la façon de distinguer les journaux populaires, des journaux professionnels, des journaux savants, voir: Magazines populaires, magazines professionnels, journaux académiques. Les journaux populaires, comparés aux journaux professionnels et savants. To evaluate a journal article look for:. Chat for Quick Help Ask Us About:. Connect with library staff via chat, email, phone or text.
Morgan Library Center Avenue Mall, Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO Skip to content. Find Services Technology About My Accounts. Colorado State University Libraries Research Guides How to Do Library Research How to Evaluate Journal Articles. How to Do Library Research This set of pages has information on how to do library research. In all cases, once you have located sources, be sure to evaluate them, using the evaluation guides. How to Evaluate Journal Articles How to Evaluate Journal Articles To evaluate a journal article look for: Purpose of Article: Why was the article written?
To: persuade the reader to do something? For example: vote a certain way, purchase an item, attend an event inform the reader? Scholarly Journals contain articles describing high quality research that has been reviewed by experts in the field prior to publication. Trade magazines may be useful for topics in business or where economic data is needed. There are also good for learning what the current "hot topics" are in an area. Popular magazines, such as Time and Newsweek , should be used sparingly, or not at all. Popular vs Trade vs Scholarly Journals. See also Evaluation Clues for Articles Taken from the Web. Organization and Content: Is the material organized and focused? Is the argument or presentation understandable? Is this original research, a review of previous research, or an informative piece?
Bias of the publisher : Some publications have an inherent bias that will impact articles printed in them. an alternative press? published by a political action PAC group? Magazines for Libraries identifies ideological slants for a select number of periodicals. Now imbedded within UlrichsWeb available to CSU affiliates only ; a yellow star to the left of the name of the periodical indicates a review, often from Magazines for Libraries. Date of Article: Some topics, such as those in the health sciences, require current information. Other subjects, such as geology, value older material as well as current. Know the time needs of your topic and examine the timeliness of the article; is it: up-to-date, out-of-date, or timeless? Bibliography: Scholarly works always contain a bibliography of the resources that were consulted.
The references in this list should be in sufficient quantity and be appropriate for the content. Look for: if a bibliography exists, if the bibliography is short or long, if the bibliography is selective or comprehensive, if the references are primary sources ex. journal articles or only secondary sources ex. encyclopedias , if the references are contemporary to the article or much older, and if the citation style is clear and consistent. Usefulness: Is the article relevant to the current research project? A well-researched, well-written, etc. article is not going to be helpful if it does not address the topic at hand. Ask, "is this article useful to me? Authority: Is the author an expert in this field?
Where is the author employed? Coverage: Does the article cover the topic comprehensively, partially, or is it an overview? Audience: For what type of reader is the author writing? This ties in with the type of journal, as popular magazine are geared to the general reader, while trade magazines are for the specialist and scholarly journals are directed at researchers, scholars or experts in the field. Is the article for: general readers, students high school, college, graduate , specialists or professionals, researchers or scholars? Illustrations: Are charts, graphs, maps, photographs, etc.
used to illustrate concepts? Are the illustrations relevant? Are they clear and professional-looking? See also Evaluating Books , Evaluating Web Pages , Evaluate a Movie, Video or Film Clip. español summary. Cómo evaluar artículos de periódicos Para evaluar artículos de periódicos considere lo siguiente: El propósito del artículo : ¿Por qué se escribió el artículo? La influencia de la casa editora La fecha del artículo La bibliografía La utilidad : ¿Es el artículo relevante para el proyecto de investigación en progreso? Versión detallada de cómo evaluar artículos de periódicos--Inglés Traducido por Maria Langley. Comment évaluer des articles de journaux Pour évaluer un article de journal, notez: Le style du journal Pour les dissertations du niveau du collège, on obtient ces informations, la plupart du temps dans des journaux scientifiques ou savants.
Les journaux savants contiennent des articles qui décrivent des recherches de haute qualité qui ont été passées en revue par des experts en la matière avant leur publication. Les magazines commerciaux peuvent être utiles pour les affaires ou quand on a besoin de données economiques. Les magazines populaires, tels que Time et Newsweek devraient être utilisés avec réserve ou pas du tout. Pour quel type de lecteur l'auteur écrit-il? Cela nous ramène au style de journal: les journaux populaires sont dirigés vers les lecteurs ordinaires, les journaux professionnels sont pour les spécialistes et les journaux scientifiques et érudits sont pour les chercheurs, les savants et les experts. L'article est il pour: les lecteurs ordinaires les étudiants Lycée, collèges universités les specialistes et professionnels chercheurs ou universitaires La date de l'article La date de l'article.
Certains sujets, tels que les sciences de la santé, exigent des informations courantes. D'autres, tels que la géologie, utilisent des publications anciennes comme des récentes. Tenez compte de l'époque de votre sujet et évaluez l'à-propos du livre, est-il: à jour, démodé ou universel? La notoriété. L'auteur est-il expert en la matière? Où l'auteur est-il employé? Qu'a-t-il écrit d'autre? L'organisation et le contenu Le matériel écrit est-il organisé et au point? L'argumentation ou la présentation sont ils compréhensibles? Est ce une recherche initiale, une critique de recherche antérieure ou un aricle d'informations?
L'article couvre-t-il le sujet complètement, partiellement ou n'est-ce qu' une vue d'ensemble? Les ouvrages savants contiennent toujours une bibliographie des ressources consultées. Les références de cette liste devraient être de quantité suffisante et être à la mesure du contenu. Cherchez: S'il existe une bibliographie, Si cette bibliographie est longue ou courte Si cette bibliographie est sélective ou complète, Si les références sont des sources principales ex. articles de journaux ou seulement des sources secondaires ex. Si les références sont contemporaines du livre ou beaucoup plus anciennes, et Si le style des citations et clair et cohérent.
Les illustrations peuvent être des diagrammes, des graphiques, des photographies, etc. utilisées pour illustrer des concepts. Ces illustrations sont-elles appropriées? Sont-elles claires et professionnelles? Traduit par Michele Nelson. How to Evaluate Journal Articles-Summary To evaluate a journal article look for: Purpose of Article: Why was the article written?
The evaluation is clearly organized and uses transitional phrases when moving to a new topic. This evaluation includes a summative statement that gives the overall impression of the Critically evaluating the main journal article and its component parts can be achieved by working through four steps: (a) understanding the main theoretical components of your main · It is important to critically evaluate the research article to know the truth behind the claims before using it as a reference in your research paper. Critical evaluation of the · What is a Critical Review? A critical summary of a particular journal article is the analysis of the weaknesses and strengths of the article. It evaluates the content and ideas of · 2. “critical appraisal is a systematic process used to identify the strengths and weakness of a research article in order to assess the usefulness and validity of research An example of how to step-by-step critically evaluate a section of a method from a journal article is provided below: Step 1. Identify our critical point: The sections outlined in red below ... read more
Were any transformations performed; if so, were there valid reasons? If a non-significant result is found, could low power be an issue? Citation Chik, A. If you are asked to critically evaluate the method and results of a study, then you could have a paragraph for each section. How to Critically Evaluate Quality of a Research Article? As PTSS has been linked to depression and other psychiatric problems in breast cancer survivors Morrill et al. The quality of a research article depends on several factors.
Was the research problem clearly identified? As Roberts et al. Order custom essay Critical evaluation of a research article with free plagiarism report. You can determine whether the article is useful and authentic or not. Is the article objective, well written and organised? Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade, critically evaluating a journal article.